Ecumenical Church Loan Fund (ECLOF) Home Page

 
 

New Horizons, the newsletter of the Ecumenical Church Loan FundNew Horizons > December 2002

 

Problem solving in southern Africa

Nils Gunnar-SmithDuring two weeks in September, the Lutheran World Federation (LWF) held a microfinance workshop in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. LWF staff from Angola, Malawi, Mozambique, Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe attended as Nils Gunnar-Smith reports.

The workshop was a response to expressed needs in the region and was designed to share information and build capacity in the region.

The workshop reminded itself that in southern Africa microfinance is an important aspect of the economic sector due to increasing poverty, unemployment, drought and poor economic performance. The challenge is how to combat poverty when conventional financial services do not meet the needs of the poor.

The difficulties those who need financial services face include unsuitable conditions imposed by conventional banks, distances to these banks, and the mobilisation of resources.

However, microfinance can bridge the gap between poverty and access to credit, and therefore this sector is very important in the region.

I attended the workshop as a lecturer and participant, and to represent the Church of Sweden, ECLOF Geneva (of which I am a board member) and the World Service Department of LWF, where I am a part-time Microfinance Co-ordinator.

It was good to see LWF and ECLOF working together in Zimbabwe, and it reminded me that all of us belong to the same family!

John Banda, of ECLOF Zimbabwe, shared his experience of working with microfinance loans. He said ECLOF Zimbabwe faced many problems in administering its programs. Its work was labour intensive yet the NEC’s structure was very lean. Microfinance, he explained, takes a long time to become sustainable. At the same time, ECLOF Zimbabwe no longer had grant capital to subsidise its operational expenses.

Mr Banda said that with one microcredit product they offered, clients made their first three repayments but always had problems in paying their last three instalments. Groups formed by borrowers were not cohesive because they had been formed only for the purposes of borrowing.

Mr Banda said that ECLOF Zimbabwe’s officers spent much of their time in dealing with disputes between members. This made the office much busier and increased costs. At the same time, income and portfolio quality did not improve.

Because of these numerous problems, the board became impatient with the microfinance product to the extent that they seriously considered dropping it. Then, in 2000, ECLOF Zimbabwe recruited two microcredit experts. They were involved in the training of other officers and the microfinance product was re-launched with new criteria:

  • groups are now sourced from churches and other solid social clubs;
  • minimum group size has been reduced to three members;
  • loans are only given for existing micro-enterprises;
  • loan sizes have been increased to take care of inflation;
  • the loan repayment period is now strictly six months;
  • repeat clients are given priority.

Client savings of 20% of the loan required are now managed by ECLOF Zimbabwe and invested separately through unit trusts. At the end of the financial year these savings can be used for clearing arrears with the consent of the clients.

John Banda added that the setting of sustainable interest rates is crucial to the running of a microcredit program. Currently, ECLOF Zimbabwe charges interest of 60% per loan cycle of six months together with a one-off loan administration fee of 5% of the loan required.

Mr Banda aroused a very heated discussion when he added, “Those who are depending on grant money for administrative costs will sooner or later collapse!”

 
Up
 

 Copyright 2003 ECLOF     www.eclof.org      info@eclof.org