|
Threat
to ECLOF Expansion in Eastern Europe
There
are no funds available to meet ECLOF needs in three countries
of Eastern Europe. That was the message given to a meeting
in Copenhagen of church-related development agencies from
six western European countries.
The
meeting, held in September 1998, heard that an ECLOF committee
had begun in Slovakia in 1997, and two others were planned
in North West Russia and Armenia this year. (The ECLOF Board
in October 1998 approved the formation of these two committees
subject to funds being available). The development agencies,
known as 'Ecumenical Partner Agencies' (EPAs) were told further
commitment from them would be necessary if this initiative
was to continue.
On a more positive note, the 14 participants, noted the many
positive aspects of current ECLOF work. There was appreciation
of the uniqueness of the decision making process in ECLOF
which gives equality to all concerned regardless whether they
are a donor or recipient of loans.
The Copenhagen meeting also discussed and recognised the need
for a forum where EPAs could consider common issues relating
to credit including lobbying the European Union on credit
related issues.
The
meeting agreed the forum would allow for regular meetings
between EPAs and ECLOF to discuss common issues on credit
as well as training on current trends in credit practices.
The forum would also make possible cooperation and the sharing
of experiences at global and field levels. One EPA told the
gathering they were considering a framework of agreement with
ECLOF to develop increased mutual support.
Imaginative
use of bilateral relationships between EPAs and National ECLOF
Committees as a strategy to provide more support for the NECs
was also discussed. Participants felt this would be welcome
provided it was within the bilateral relationships guidelines
and was the exception rather than the rule. More monitoring
would be needed but it could also lead to improved performance
on the part of NECs.
Also
raised was the question of ECLOF itself receiving loans for
a specified period of time from EPAs and churches which have
reserves they do not currently need. It was recognised that
such funds should be used only in countries which have financial
stability.
Once
again, as in other parts of the world, the need to raise the
ECLOF profile among local congregations was stressed. ECLOF's
achievements and experiences should be made more well known
so that those organisations, including some within the ecumenical
family, who wish to establish their own credit programmes
can learn from what ECLOF has done.
|